Sunday, July 14, 2013

Guns and Race in Florida

TWO stories from America, and specifically the State of Florida:

Yesterday evening a man called George Zimmerman walked free from court after a jury, having deliberated for more than 16 hours, had found him not guilty of murder.

Zimmerman had admiited to shooting 17-year old Trayvon Martin, on the night of February 26, 2012, but claimed he was acting in self-defence after the black teenager attacked him.

That night, Trayvon had just gone to a local 7- Eleven convenience store and was walking back through the Retreat at Twin Lakes to the home of his father's fiance, where he and his father were staying. He was unarmed, unless one counts the can of iced tea and bag of Skittles which he had just purchased.

Zimmerman, a neighbourhood watch volunteer, said he thought the youth looked suspicious because of his slow and meandering gait. Phoning the police, he then set out after the boy, there was a confrontation, and Zimmerman shot him. 

After six weeks, and numerous protests, police arrested Zimmerman and charged him with second-degree murder. Later they released tapes of neighbours' 911 calls in which can be heard screams and then gunfire. From these it is not clear who is screaming for help, or who is attacking whom. What is clear is that  only one man was armed, and only one lay dead afterwards.

From character witnesses and other evidence it would appear hard to see what Trayvon Martin was guilty of beyond being black, and a teenager. Whereas Zimmerman did have a gun, and followed him, and did have a criminal record.

But now Zimmerman walks free, and whether or not he was racially prejudiced, he has already become a hero to those who are.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/13/george-zimmerman-not-guilty_n_3588743.html?1373767350&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

We might take that as just another case of America's lax attitudes to gun crime were it not for the next case, which comes from not far away:

Marissa Alexander was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for firing a pistol in the air, hoping to scare away a physically abusive ex-husband, Rico Gray. Marissa, five feet, two inches tall and slightly built, had been no match for her trucker ex-partner, who admitted that twice he had thrown her out of the house.   “She’s a little person so it doesn’t take much for me to pick her up and tote her out my front door . . . You know, I pretty much picked her up and throwed her out.”

In the months before the incident that sent Marissa to prison, in addition to bodily heaving her out the door, Gray had beaten her, head-butted her in the face while she was pregnant, sent her to the hospital. One of his three arrests on domestic violence charges had been for an attack on Alexander that led to a conviction and probation. He had other convictions for violence against women.

On August 10, 2010, as Gray approached her in a rage, Alexander (a software firm employee with an MBA and no previous criminal record) fired warning shots with a pistol. As Gray admitted in a deposition to the District Atormey,  he had already attacked her and chased her into the garage, before she came out with the gun.

“I honestly think she just didn’t want me to put my hands on her anymore so she did what she feel like she have to do to make sure she wouldn’t get hurt, you know. You know, she did what she had to do.”

 “The gun was never actually pointed at me. When she raised the gun down and raised it up, you know, the gun was never pointed at me. The fact is, you know . . . she never been violent toward me. I was always the one starting it. If she was violent toward me, it was because she was trying to get me up off her or stop me from doing.”

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/28/v-print/2821403/you-call-this-justice-not-if-its.html#storylink=cpy

The bullets went into the wall. No one was hurt. Nevertheless a jury convicted Marissa of aggravated assault with a firearm and, under Florida’s draconian mandatory minimum sentencing laws, the presiding judge was left with no discretion. So she got 20 years. Her thug husband got custody of their baby son.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/28/v-print/2821403/you-call-this-justice-not-if-its.html 

That Marissa Alexander had a similar complexion to Trayvon Martin, rather than his killer, cannot possibly have influenced a court in Florida, US of A, can it? Nor the fact that she is female.

And whatever this says about the state of Florida, I should not think it will influence any one's holiday plans. 

BUT along with the demonstrations in many American cities, someone has taken a lead:
http://blog.blacknews.com/2013/07/stevie-wonder-boycotts-florida-wont-perform-until-stand-your-ground-law-abolished101.html#.UejvHG3Guzk

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/28/v-print/2821403/you-call-this-justice-not-if-its.html#storylink=cpy

Labels: , ,

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Back to Jail for Con-Man "Lawyer" who acted for War Criminals and boasted he'd funded Cons

GIOVANNI di Stefano has been sentenced to fourteen years in jail for a series of frauds on “desperate and vulnerable victims”  whom  he tricked into thinking he was a bona fide lawyer.

 Di Stefano was convicted on 25 charges, including deception, fraud and money laundering
 He pleaded guilty to another two counts of fraud and further three counts ordered to lie on file

Di Stefano, 57,became known as the Devil’s Advocate for taking on “unwinnable” cases, though the Law Society said he was not qualified, nor entitled to act as a lawyer at all.

Judge Alistair McCreath, the Recorder of Westminster, noted there were many offences over significant periods of time. The fact that the victims – which included a disabled man seeking damages for the loss of an arm – were all “desperate and vulnerable” and faced losses which were not just financial but also included the “raising and dashing of false hope” were aggravating factors, the judge said.

The judge said the case was not just about money. "It is also about something different and great – it is about the real distress you caused to so many people. You had no regard for them nor for their anguish,” he said. “Your only concern was to line your own pockets.”
.
Among the offences to which Di Stefano pleaded guilty was stealing £150,000 compensation that should have gone to a man who had lost an arm in a car crash. The money was due as part of an insurance policy but di Stefano had it paid in to his business account and “duly stole it”. This was a “wicked” crime and is one which “stands in a league of its own”, according to the judge.

But then Di Stefano, a former associate of Serb war criminal 'Arkan' and director of Dundee football club, was always in a league of his own. And he had quite a long run.

He reportedly served a six-month sentence for fraud and false pretenses in 1975 in Ireland, and a three-year sentence for obtaining property by deception and other charges in 1976 in the UK. Di Stefano insisted that these convictions were those of a different person, called "John" instead of "Giovanni", although they shared the same surname, birthday and birthplace.

Then in June 1984 he was arrested again and charged with fraud before being released on bail. He was again arrested in August of that year and refused bail. In 1986, Di Stefano was tried for conspiracy to obtain property by deception and fraudulent trading, and was convicted after a 78-day trial, jailed for five years, and prohibited from being a company director for 10 years; In 1990 a Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal ruled that Di Stefano could not be employed by any British solicitor without permission from the Law Society,

Di Stefano claims to have been freed on appeal, though records indicate his appeal was unsuccessful. After three years in jail however he was back in business, attempting to clinch deals in America and New Zealand before turning up in Yugoslavia in 1991. He obtained Yugoslav citizenship thanks to his "friend" Slobodan Milosevic, and became an associate -political and business - of Zelijko Raznjatovic, better-known as Arkan, leader of the so-called Serb Volunteer Guard, or "Tigers", irregulars operating for the Serb Interior Ministry, who enjoyed rape and pillage as a perk for their job of 'ethnic cleansing'.

In 1997 Di Stefano wrote warning British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook that British soldiers would be killed if they made any attempt to bring in Arkan as a war criminal. The businessman-"lawyer" also boasted to the Sunday Times that he had met John Major several times, and that he had donated £10,000 to the Tory party before his conviction and another £20,000 after release. He insisted there was nothing irregular about this.

"I am a Conservative. I'm the epitome of conservative.
It is not an offence to give money to politicians for their services" (Sunday Times, July 27, 1997)

As Arkan expanded into various businesses in Serbia, from flowers to a football club, Di Stefano too began popping up as fairy godfather offering to invest money in cash-strapped British soccer clubs - Dundee, Norwich, Northampton Town, - and even a doomed Northumberland colliery. Somehow, while still abroad, he knew where to dangle his carrot.

Arkan boasted that he would go to the Hague if wanted, and bring down all sorts of people. He was gunned down himself in a Belgrade hotel, and obviously no longer required the services of his lawyer and partner Di Stefano. Then Di Stefano came under investigation in Italy in connection with business affairs. But somehow he survived to fight another day.

Tony Clarke, the Labour MP for Northampton South, who fought attempts by di Stefano to take over Northampton Town football club, said: "Everything about this man is shrouded in mystery. The authorities need to take a very close look at his legal qualifications, because if he is not legally qualified, heaven knows how that affects the cases he has been involved in."

Somehow, qualified, disqualified, or whatever, Di Stefano claimed some big name clients, big bad name that is - time-share racketeer John Palmer, road-rage killer and bullion robber Kenneth Noye, Dr.Harold Shipman, property tycoon and thug-employer Nicholas "tenants are scum" van Hoogstraten. Indeed he was remarkably successful for Van Hoogstraten, who was sentenced to 10 years for the killing of a business rival in 2002, but released on appeal, even though two of his associates remained serving life sentences.

Van Hoogstraten was ordered to pay the victim's family £6 million in a civil case.
He was estimated at being worth £500 million, though he said his assets in the UK had been placed in the names of his children. His assets in property and farming in Zimbabwe were estimated at £200 million. It may be through Van Hoogstraten that Di Stefano claimed Robert Mugabe as a friend. His ambition to represent Saddam Hussein on trial was less successful, but all in all the lawyer-who-wasn't has enjoyed a brilliant and long career, knowing all the top gangsters. Is this really the end for Giovanni?

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Another bloody Page in US history

WHAT kind of society is the United States of America? What kind of culture? Merely calling it capitalism, or describing it as Western, would tell us very little. As for being Christian, perhaps a majority of Americans are. Certainly the various denominations, and all kind of gospel preachers, do a roaring trade.

But more than a century after the OK Corral, modern America, or sections of it, not just hoodlums but supposedly respectable middle class citizens, are still a gun totin' society. It seems to be the minorities who are expected to "turn the other cheek".

Last night hundreds of people, decent folk of all religions and none, gathered for a candlelit vigil in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, to pay respects to six members of the Sikh community, shot dead in their temple by white supremacist Wade Michael Page.

Some felt guilty that they had not known anything about the Sikhs in their town.

"We didn't know about them," said Loren Bauer, a retired machinist. "We see them but we don't pay much attention. A lot of them drive cabs and have gas stations and convenience stores. The only thing I ever heard about them was that a lot of people thought they were Muslims after 9/11."

Teri Pelzek, too, had barely heard of Sikhs. "I knew nothing about them at all. I don't think a lot of people did. When we don't know about somebody's religion we assume the worst," she said

Police and others remarked on the Sikh's willingness to show forgiveness to their assailant. Page was shot dead (or shot himself, according to some reports)after also shooting a police officer,

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/08/sikh-forgiveness-oak-creek-vigil

Americans' ignorance of other people and religions has been blamed for attacks on Sikhs, who with their turbans have been mistaken for Muslims by those with only a hazy idea of eastern religions. The implication of some comments would suggest that killing Muslims is OK. A more pertinent suspicion might be that the killers go looking for handy targets, and are not fussy whom they hit. Shocking as the temple shooting was, it was not entirely new, as Sonny Hundal has poited out:

On 15 September 2001, 52-year-old Balbir Singh Sodhi, a gas-station owner in Arizona, was shot five times by Frank Roque. While Sodhi died instantly, Roque went on to shoot at other ethnic minorities before going to a local bar and boasting: "They're investigating the murder of a turban-head down the street."

Yesterday, a gunman opened fire on a Sikh congregation in Wisconsin, killing six people in what is now being treated as an act of "domestic terrorism". Some witnesses say the shooter had a tattoo marking the September 11 attacks, though this is not confirmed by the authorities.

While the "war on terror" that followed September 2001 badly affected Muslim families in the west, it is sadly less well-known that Sikhs have also faced significant harassment as a consequence. The Sikh Coalition of Washington said yesterday that Sikhs in the US have faced more than 700 such incidents since 9/11; authorities still do not officially collect data on religious hate crimes against them.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/06/wisconsin-temple-shooting-sikh-scapegoats?INTCMP=SRCH

Not all shootings have any rationale. It would have been hard to predict that a man would enter a cinema complex in Aurora, Colorado, and start shooting at random, killing a dozen people inlcuding a six year old child, and wounding 59 more. Nevertheless, it seems remarkable not only that the man could buy the hardware and ammunition he did (thanks to freedoms protected by the National Rifle Association) but that nobody thought to ask him what he had in m mind. As the police chief told the press:

The suspect had legally purchased four weapons in the last 60 days from gun shops, including an assault rifle, a shotgun and two Glock handguns, Oates said. Holmes had also purchased more than 6,000 rounds of ammunition -- 3,000 for the assault rifle, 3,000 for the two handguns and 300 rounds for the shotgun.

“All weapons he possessed, he possessed legally. All clips he possessed, he possessed legally. All ammunition he possessed, he possessed legally,” Oates said.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-colorado-shooting-20120720,0,5725827.story


Such shootings are not confined to the United States. Here in Britain, notwithstanding gun control laws, we've had Hungerford and Dunblane. Norway has the crazed Nazi mass murderer Breivik. The Wisconsin temple shootings particularly bring to mind the action of Baruch Goldstein, who as a doctor was presumably familiar with the Hippocratic Oath to save lives, but as a religious Zionist felt it right to enter the mosque at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron with an automatic weapon, and murder 29 Muslim worshippers, wounding over 120 more. But Goldstein too was an American, born in Brooklyn, and joined Meir Kahane's Jewish Defence League, before he emigrated to Palestine, and joined Kahane's fascist offshoot, the Kach party.

It may not always be possible to point to an ideological motivation for these murders. I have friends who died of cancer without ever having smoked a cigarette. But enough evidence has been found of a link between smoking and cancer for tobacco advertsing to be restricted, fag packets to carry a government health warning, and pubs to ban smoking. Somehow whenever a right-wing bomber or killer is identified he is always an "ex-member" of racist and fascist organisations, rather as a lung cancer victim may have given up smoking.

Wane Michael Page was known as a white supremacist, and associated with far right parties and the Nazi rock scene. He seemed unable to hold a job. Neighbours found him a little "creepy" . None of this seems to have interfered with his acquiring firearms. But then he had an interesting background.

"Page's stepmother, Laura Page, said it wasn't always that way. She described him as a "normal little boy" and struggled to explain how he came to be a mass murderer with a Facebook picture of him in front of a Nazi swastika.

Laura Page said that joining the military had appeared to be good for her stepson because it "gave him focus".

"Now I greatly question that direction. I don't know if the military was good for him. I don't know. I wish I had some answers. And we're not going to have answers because he's dead," she said.

Some reports have described Page as a "failed" soldier, but he did well enough after joining in 1992 to be assigned to a psychological operations unit at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the Green Berets' birthplace. The psy ops unit is regarded by the Army as exclusive.

But at the time Fort Bragg was also a recruiting centre for white hate groups including the National Alliance, once regarded as one of the most effective such groups and also among the most extreme because it openly glorified Adolf Hitler. The Military Law Review at the time reported that National Alliance flags were openly hung in barracks and, out of uniform, soldiers sported neo-Nazi symbols and played records about killing blacks and Jews.

"White supremacists have a natural attraction to the army," the Military Law Review said. "They often see themselves as warriors, superbly fit and well-trained in survivalist techniques and weapons and poised for the ultimate conflict with various races."

When I first met Page he was new to Southern California but he'd been around the white supremacist movement for a while. In Southern California he was spending time with a lot of different groups and was very involved in the white power music scene playing guitar in bands and trying to help promote shows. He had contacts with the National Alliance, Hammerskin Nation, different Klan groups, Volksfront and various other groups active in the white supremacist movement.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/07/wade-michael-page-wisconsin-shooting

Not only were Page and his politics known, they were studied. Brian Levin, J.D. of the University of California, has interviewed Criminology professor Pete Simi, whose study focused on the Nazi hate bands in southern California. Dr. Simi recently co-authored (with Robert Futrell, University of Nevada, Las Vegas) the book American Swastika: Inside the White Power Movement's Hidden Spaces of Hate. His research on extremist movements has been funded by the National Institute of Justice,

Here are some extracts from that interview:

When did you first meet Wade Page and what was he generally like at that time?

I met Page in 2001 while I was conducting fieldwork studying white supremacist groups in Southern California. Page had recently moved to Orange County, California and was living with another research subject I already knew. Wade was immediately friendly and didn't seem to have any problems with me hanging around doing research. He actually seemed to enjoy talking about his beliefs and at times I think he hoped to convert me. There were times when he was a little quiet and awkward but other times he seemed to loosen up and would joke around a lot. He definitely had a drinking problem and would pass out regularly. His heavy drinking made it hard for him to get to work.

Who was Page affiliated with and what types of activities was he involved in?

When I first met Page he was new to Southern California but he'd been around the white supremacist movement for a while. In Southern California he was spending time with a lot of different groups and was very involved in the white power music scene playing guitar in bands and trying to help promote shows. He had contacts with the National Alliance, Hammerskin Nation, different Klan groups, Volksfront and various other groups active in the white supremacist movement.

How long did you know Page and when was the last time he contacted you?

Approximately two years between 2001 through 2003. My last contact with him was a phone conversation in 2003 while he was still in Southern California and while I was still in graduate school in Las Vegas.

What is Hate Rock?

Hate rock spans several different types of music but is connected by an underlying commitment to white supremacist and neo-Nazi ideology. The bands and shows can be found across the globe but are most prominent in Europe and the United States.

What are the most important aspects of hate music?

Hate music is important for a number of reasons. The music is used to recruit new members and generate revenue for organizations. Most importantly the music brings like-minded individuals together in terms of smaller music shows at bars and larger music festivals held on private property. The music helps members feel like they are part of something bigger and there are others out there who feel the same way they do.

What were some of his favorite websites or social networks?

He talked about Radio White, a local Orange County, California white power radio website, and even helped host some of the shows. He also talked about Resistance Records and Panzerfaust Records websites, and the National Alliance website. I also remember Stormfront coming up but I don't recall if he talked much about posting on the site. During that time I knew him he would spend time on the Internet but wasn't on there all the time like some people involved in these groups.

How would you categorize Page?

I would say he was an independent neo-Nazi skinhead who saw his musical involvement as his main form of activism.

How did Page speak about Muslims, Sikhs, other groups and 9/11?

I distinctly remember an email exchange with him shortly after 9/11 and he was very angry about Muslims and said something to the effect of America needing to go over to the Middle East and bomb 'em all. Aside from that, most of his rhetoric was not specifically targeted toward Muslims or Sikhs. Most of his rhetoric was directed more generically about "nonwhites" or more specifically about Blacks and Jewish people. Of course he didn't use these terms but instead referred to "ZOG" (Zionist Occupational Government) or "niggers" etc.

What was your response when you found out that Page was a subject of your research and an acquaintance?

When I saw his photo on the Southern Poverty Law Center website Monday afternoon I literally felt sick. It actually took me a couple minutes to actually be able to say, "That's Wade, I knew him."


How did Page get involved in the world of hate?

He explained to me that growing up in the Denver area he was aware of skinheads including white power folks after he got involved in the local punk rock scene in the late 1980s. But he said that his real interest started during his time in the military. He once told me, "If you don't go into the military as a racist, you definitely leave as one." He also talked about meeting neo-Nazis in the military and being exposed to neo-Nazi literature while in the military. Once he left the military he went to a music show where he met members of the band Youngland and shortly after that he drove his motorcycle across country relocating to Southern California with not much more than the clothes on his back.

He was stationed at Fort Bragg where the National Alliance actively recruited and where neo-Nazi soldiers were convicted of murdering a Black couple just off base. What did he think of those killings?

We talked about the murders once and James Burmeister and he certainly didn't condemn the violence. He didn't come out and say, "yeah that's what needs to happen" but he didn't seem bothered at all by it either. Like a lot of the violence that comes from the movement there's this attitude of you gotta do these things to survive. It's a twisted way of turning unprovoked violence into self-defense.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-levin-jd/exclusive-interview-with_b_1751181.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false#sb=3136701,b=facebook

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, December 16, 2011

Two gun outrages, differently reported, both raising questions and echoes of the past

TWO shooting outrages on the same day shocked two European cities this week. In the Belgian city of Liege, at least four people were killed in a gun and grenade attack at the Christmas market, and more than 123 people left wounded, some seriously.

In Florence's central squares a gunman killed two street vendors, both Senegalese, and wounded several others.

In both cases the killers appeared to have no rational motive, just opening fire on innocent people going about their ordinary lives. In both cases, the murderers were already known to the police, and each of them finished off by turning their guns on themselves, unlike the Norwegian killer Breivik who has lived to appear in court but whom doctors have declared insane.

Though neither outrage was on the scale of the massacre in Norway, both roused horor and anger, and both were rightly reported, but not to the same extent, at least in the UK. I saw the Liege shooting covered on TV, but not the attack in Florence. A report for the Institute of Race Relations wonders whether the difference in casualties in the two cities was big enough to justify their different coverage.

"The reporting was most obvious if you compare the BBC World Service's coverage between December 13 and 14 with that of BBC Radio 4. The World Service covered both incidents, while Radio 4 in its bulletins kept completely silent about Florence. In UK papers, too, the Liège story was front page news with the Florence incident, if covered at all, tacked on as an appendage. Was the reason that the victims in Florence were all Senegalese street vendors and violence against those without papers has become such an everyday feature of Italian life that it is not considered newsworthy?"

In both cases there are questions to be asked about how the killers were loose on the streets with firearms. Liege is, it's true, not only an industrial city but one historically associated with weaponry, from the Middle Ages through to the NATO-issue FN FAL automatic rifle produced at nearby Herstal.

All the same it is worrying that Nordine Amrani, a man who, according the BBC, was already "known to Belgian police as a gun enthusiast"(sic) was able to leave home in Liege that morning with an FAL assault rifle, hand grenades and a revolver, just off you might say for a day's shooting.

Amrani received a five-year prison sentence in 2008 for possessing a large arsenal and growing cannabis. However, a court of appeal acquitted him of the gun conviction a year later on the grounds that he had had the necessary permissions to keep them, his lawyer Jean-Francois Dister told La Libre Belgique newspaper.

When he was paroled in 2010, his guns were not returned because of his drug-dealing conviction but otherwise he was under no special gun restrictions, Mr Dister explained.

According to Liege public prosecutor Daniele Reynders, the paroled man showed no sign of mental instability.

At the time of the massacre, the 32 year old Ixelles-born man, a welder by trade, had been due to attend a police station for questioning about a vice charge. He had appeared in courts several times in his life and had a previous vice conviction from 2003. Apparently he felt the police were picking on him.

When he was arrested in 2008, police found 2,800 cannabis plants he was growing in a warehouse. They also found 10 guns and 9,500 gun parts. The arsenal included a Law rocket launcher, an AK-47 assault rifle, a sniper rifle, a K31 rifle, a Fal assault rifle and hundreds of cartridges, Le Soir reports.

"Amrani made silencers himself," its article notes."At the time, Amrani refused to say where the weapons had come from and where they were destined." He was acquitted of gun possession charges due to "grey areas" left by a change in the law, the paper says.'

Amrani opened fire in a square not far from the police station where he had been due to report on charges relating to a party in November and a woman's disappearence. He killed himself rather than face custody. After searching addresses associated with Amrani, and finding the body of a murdered woman, prosecutors said they had not found any message from the gunman. The woman, who had been shot through the head, was found in the same warehouse where Amrani cultivated cannabis in 2008, prosecutors confirmed.

If the Belgian killer felt driven beyond reason, or was a petty criminal who had become mixed up with something bigger than he understood, there is less doubt about the motivation of the gunman in Florence. Like Ander Breivik, the perpetrator of the Oslo massacre, Gianluca Casseri was inspired by the racist politics of the far Right. As the IRR report comments, the similarity with the Breivik case, even though on a much smaller scale, make it more remarkable that the Florence shootings did not rate more media attention.

Casseri was a member of CasaPound, a fascist group which takes its name from the American poet Ezra Pound, who moved to Italy and became an admirer of Mussolini and Hitler. A contributer before the War to Oswald Mosley's fascist paper Action, Pound was charged with treason for his wartime broadcasts for the Axis, but a diagnosis of insanity saved him from execution. As much as his poetic standing, or even his links to Mussolini, what may commend Pound to current day fascists is his early obsession with "usury" as the culprit for war and crisis, and his admiration (some say later repudiated) for the classic conspiracy work The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Casseri himself was the author of fantasy novels including The Key of Chaos about a wizard, a mathematician and an alchemist, which enjoyed some popularity. He also wrote an academic paper about Dracula folklore and was the editor of a niche magazine about fantasy and horror fiction and comics. CasaPound - known in Italian anti-racist circles for its attacks on Left targets - denies being extremist, though its vice president Simone de Stefano while acknowledging that Mussolini's racial laws were a mistake, calls his 'brand of fascism' to be the group's 'point of reference, a vision of the state and the economy and the concept of sacrifice'. CasaPound has also sponsored rock concerts at which supporters whip themselves with belts because, according to them, it is 'a way to risk pain, to confront yourself in ways society does not allow'.

Africans in Italy had no difficulty recognising what happened in Florence as a racist attack. About 300 people, many of them also street vendors, gathered in an impromptu protest at the killings, demanding to see Casseri's corpse. 'Don't tell us he was a madman', one told the Guardian, 'because if he was he would have killed whites as well as blacks'.

In both Italy and Belgium there are echoes from the past in these two attacks. Before they had the immigrants to target, Italy's modern day fascists made do with atrocities against their fellow-countrymen, such as the Milan bank and Bologna railway station bombings (August 1980). These actions were also part of a "strategy of tension" promoted by America's CIA and linked with elements in both Italy's own "secret state" and the so-called Gladio stay-behind network set up after the war supposedly to resist Soviet takeover. This was turned against the native Italian communists and left, both by 'false-flag' terrorism for which the Left was meant to take the blame, and creating a general mood of fear from which it was hoped a right-wing, even military government would benefit.

In Belgium a series of violent crimes between 1982 and 1985, culminating in another shopping centre shooting, in Brabant, were carried out by a gang later linked with supposed "rogue" policemen and the gendarmerie, as well as a shadowy fascist oufit called Westland New Post. There too the suspicion was raised of Gladio involvment and the aim of terrorising people into accepting a right-wing regime that promised "order".

[1] Tom Kington, 'Italy's fascists stay true to Mussolini's ideology' Guardian, 6 November 2011. [2] Tom Kington, 'Florence gunman shoots Senegalese street vendors dead', Guardian, 13 December 2011.

References in A tale of two cities, by IRR European News Team
http://www.irr.org.uk/2011/december/ha000016.html



Other references to see:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/13/florence-gunman-shoots-street-vendors?INTCMP=SRCH

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/27/ex-berlusconi-minister-defends-breivik?intcmp=239

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-16175019

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16175795

Italy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_1980_Bologna_bombing

London connections:

http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/29267

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Fiore

Belgium:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Brabant#Gladio

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nijvel_gang

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Belgravia is not burning, and the City is still safe


A VIEW FROM DOWN UNDER. Andrew Dyson in Melbourne 'Age'

OVER four days in August, riots and looting in London and other English cities and towns have caused widespread damage. Four people were killed. Over a thousand arrested. Armoured vehicles were out in Clapham, something not seen since the 1926 general strike. On Tuesday night over 16,000 police were mobilised on the streets of London, and even in quiet suburban areas where nothing was happening shopkeepers were advised to close early and old people to stay indoors - whether an over-reaction or a propaganda move.

The Prime Minister and the Mayor of London had to cut short their holidays, and MPs were recalled. To hear them talk the trouble that flared up was just down to "criminality", and "sick" people, in no way connected with social causes or government policies. Yet there were no fires in Belgravia or Mayfair, which have their share of criminals, nor windows smashed in the City of London, where bankers and speculators loot whole nations and continents. One could define and almost predict the social geography of the rioting, and we can see its political limits.

Indeed the first outbreaks came from the same places which saw rioting in the 1980s, Broadwater Farm and Brixton, followed by Liverpool. But contrary to what some foreign observers seemed to assume, though black youth feeling against the police was an issue, these were not "race" but class riots. In some places it seemed the majority of the youth on the street were white. Outside the big cities there were riots in places known as islands of poverty amid affluence. The majority of those arrested and brought to courts which are working overtime are under 24, many under 18, and most are unemployed.

The initial explosion of anger in Tottenham was sparked off by the police killing of Mark Duggan on Thursday evening, August 4, as he was on his way home in a minicab. The reaction was not instantaneous, and the dead man's family and friends have said they did not want the violence. But as with the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes on the Underground at Stockwell, the police were a lot quicker at putting out a story to justify the shooting than they have been at telling the truth.

Mark Duggan, a 29-year old father of two had been killed by members of the specialist armed police unit CO19 who were waiting for him with officers involved in Operation Trident, supposedly aimed at black gun crime. We were told a police officer had been wounded in a gunfight. The Independent Police Complaints Commission, which quickly took over the investigation, said a non-police issue handgun was recovered from the scene and a bullet was found lodged in a police officer's radio. Ballistics tests later revealed this bullet had come from a police weapon, and ricocheted after hitting Mark Duggan in the arm. There was no evidence to prove the other weapon found, wrapped in a sock, had belonged to Duggan, or that he had fired it. No wounded officer, no gunfight.

Meanwhile rumours were circulating, locally and on the internet, that police had dragged Mark Duggan from his cab, held him down and shot him. Neither the Met nor the IPCC apparently felt obliged to get in touch properly with Duggan's family, who were left in the dark mourning a loved one and feeling they did not count. It was 36 hours before they were even allowed to see the body.

Late on Saturday afternoon, August 6, members of the family and friends were joined by other local people to march from Broadwater Farm estate to Tottenham Police Station. They demanded that a senior officer speak and tell them what had happened. Those who knew Mark Duggan best said they did not believe he would have been foolish enough to open fire on the police. Eventually, a chief inspector spoke with the crowd but they were expecting a commissioner. It was after 8pm, when disappointed demonstrators were already leaving with their kids, that some youths decided they had been patient long enough, and attacked two police cars. This was the start of the rioting that spread on the following nights to other parts of London, and other parts of the country.

Despite the fact that it kicked off with young, disadvantaged and mostly black young people confronting the state, this was not the first round of "the revolution", as some starry-eyed romantic lefties seemed to hope, not even "working class youth fighting back", as a friend in my old home town, Salford, claimed, at least not in a conscious sense. The people who set fire to a carpet store in Tottenham gave no thought to the working class families in flats above, who lost everything and were lucky to get out alive. Three young Asian guys hit by a car and killed in Birmingham were only trying to protect their family shop and homes, just as they might at other times had to fight off racist attacks. They were not guarding Buckingham Palace or the City banks, and nor was the man in Ealing who died from a beating, after trying to stop youths setting light to bins by his road.

It makes no sense to spin illusions in what riots can achieve, crediting all the crowd with lofty aims, nor to judge them as though all and everybody was responsible for what each did. A crowd of individuals can range from those who want to make a point, and are genuinely angry, through those who are there for the buzz, or a fight, to those who have merely come along to watch, and then maybe seen the opportunity to join in looting, grabbing whatever they can. In one place people were videoed looting Poundstretcher, which hardly suggests great ambition, nor a criminal master plan, but does look as though they were hard up.

For David Cameron, of course, it was all "sheer criminality", and disregard for the community, forgetting the time he and Mayor Boris were raising cain in the notorious Bullingden Club, but forgetting too that it was his grand dame (and Blair's too) Baroness Thatcher who declared "There is no such thing as society". For over two decades the Tories, their media, and New Labour have denigrated the workers' part in creating wealth, done everything to weaken and undermine union solidarity, and destroyed working class communities, as we saw with the miners. They freed capitalists and bankers to seek profit wherever and however they can, and competed in extolling acquisitive individualism.

What's more our MPs and leaders set a good example. As a remark making the rounds on Facebook observes, "Jim Sheridan, Lembit Opik, David Crausby, Shahid Malik, Ruth Kelly among those who looted plasma TVs on their expenses - and they're on £64k salaries. None of them went to jail". Nor indeed did Salford MP and ex-minister Hazel Blears, now condemning the rioters, feel too badly about charging the taxpayer for an £800 bed. Neither Margaret Thatcher nor Tony Blair got where they are by hard work and honesty. One led a government that was "economical with the truth" to help arm Saddam's Iraq, the other lied to go to war helping destroy that country.

The politicians who are condemning the youth and demanding that parents "take responsibility", with the threat of evictions and stopping people's benefits (what about those who like some of the football hooligans have well-paid jobs and are home owners?), will not face their own responsibilities. But on top of the industries and jobs they have seen off, their cuts alone are doing much bigger and more long-lasting damage than the riots and vandalism.

In some of the areas where rioting took place there is 30 per cent and more unemployment, particularly affecting the young. Young people who might stay on or go to college in the hope of improving their chances with qualifications, or even try unpaid work experience, are being deprived of the Educational Maintenance Allowance (EMA) which was supposed to help those from poor families do just that. Local authorities are cutting youth services, libraries, sports centres, swimming pools. Besides leaving young people with nothing to do, it may be sending them a certain message.

Now the message from Communities(sic) and Local Government Minister Eric Pickles is that he is sure magistrates will hand out sentences that reflect "the public's anger", (the judiciary in this country is supposed to be independent, by the way). He and Cameron still intend to cut police budgets and manpower, but will strengthen police powers. The fire service, who were praised for the brave way they got to the blazes, is also facing cuts. Cameron is talking of taking powers to curb social networking sites on the internet, which were apparently a Good Thing in the Arab Spring but a Bad Thing in the British Summer and Autumn. That makes it easier for government to control the news.

As for the 'Opposition' , Labour's Glenda Jackson MP (Hampstead and Highgate) claims the youngsters were privileged with BlackBerrys (whatever they are. I'm too old!) and wants water cannon used, as does mayoral hopeful Ken Livingstone, leaving Tory Home Secretary Theresa May who has been reluctant, looking like a liberal softie.

Still, never mind. Senior police officers can feel relieved the heat has fallen away from the hacking and corruption scandal, and they are being criticised for supposedly holding back. Belgravia is not burning, and the City is still safe. For now.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Criminology - study or participation in crime?

IF international guests want to understand what's happening on the West Bank they are welcome to join demonstrations like those Bil'in.

ACADEMICS invited to participate in an international criminology conference later this month are being warned that by going along to take part they will actually be complicit in a crime.

The warning comes from the Israeli peace bloc, Gush Shalom.

The conference scheduled on May 30 is being held in the Israeli settlement of Ariel, in the occupied Palestinian West Bank.

In a letter to participants, Gush Shalom says "the conference itself is complicity in the violation of International Law".

Many Israeli academics and artistes, including leading theatre companies, have been defying government pressure to go to Ariel, saying that the establishment of a settlers' university there and attempts to hold cultural events are aimed at 'normalising' occupation, and securing their complicity.

The conference on May 30 is entitled "
Pink Crime - Women, Crime and Punishment".
(http://www.ariel.ac.il/criminology/conferences-heb/3766)

Among the lecturers mentioned as due to speak at the conference, and to whom Gush Shalom sent its letters. are criminologists from universities and colleges within Israel as well as guest lecturers from Britain and the United States. The latter include Jean-Pierre Gauci, and Isla Masson of King's College, London., Breea C. Willingham, State University of New York and Dr. Stephen J. Tripodi, Florida State University

In the letter, signed by Gush Shalom spokesperson Adam Keller, and sent out on May 8, the participants at the conference are reminded that the conference is due to take place at a settlement established in Occupied Territory in flagrant violation of International Law, and which constitutes a major obstacle to achieving peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Therefore, says Keller, the holding a conference in Ariel in itself constitutes complicy in the breach of International Law.

Keller stats that "Criminology is an academic discipline designed to scientifically and systematically investigate the effects of crime (crime by women in this specific case). There is great irony and an inherent contradiction between these aims of Criminology and the holding a criminologists' conference in circumstances where the conference itself became complicity in the commission of a crime."

Following is the letter in full.

Greetings

I am writing to you because your name appears on the list of lecturers at a conference due on May 30 this year, entitled " Pink Crime" and dealing with the phenomenon of crimes committed by women. Definitely a serious issue, well deserving of being seriously discussed by the practitioners of criminology. I would like, however, to draw your attention to the fact that the conference will take place at the institute known as the "University Center of Samaria", located at the Israeli settlement of Ariel on the West Bank.

It is important to note that deliberations taking place at such a location, under the auspices of such an institution, are not – and cannot be – a "purely academic" event, free of political connotations. The settlement of Ariel is in an Occupied Territory under the rule of a military governor. It is not part of Israel - not according to Israeli law, since no government has ever annexed it, and certainly not under International Law. The creation and maintenance of the settlements, including Ariel, is a grave violation of International Law, which prohibits an occupying power from transferring its citizens to the Occupied Territory. This, in addition to the settlements being the main obstacle blocking Israel from reaching peace with its Palestinian neighbors.

Criminology is an academic discipline designed to systematically and scientifically investigate phenomena of crime (crime by women in this specific case.) There is a great irony and an irresolvable contradiction involved in the holding of a Criminology conference at a location and under circumstances which make the conference itself an accessory to crime.

The settlers in general, and those at Ariel in particular, make great efforts to provide for themselves a "respectable" and "legitimate" image. The creation of an academic institution in Ariel, and the inviting of lecturers such as yourself to speak at academic conferences, is a significant part of this effort.

Should you go through with lecturing at the Ariel conference, in spite of the above arguments, may I suggest that you devote a few words at the beginning of your lecture to the contradiction between the goals of the conference, designed to reduce the effects of crime in human society, and the severe violation of International Law constituted by the conference's location.

Sincerely Yours

Adam Keller

Spokesperson
Gush Shalom

(The Israeli Peace Bloc)
PO Box 2542
Holon, Israel

info@gush-shalom.org


Today I received a copy of this letter which Gush Shalom is sending to supporters and friends abroad:

Dear Friends:

As we let you know Gush Shalom has sent letters to Israeli and international criminologists due to take part in a May 30 conference at the West Bank settlement of Ariel, pointing out that participation in such a conference amounts to complicity in the violation of International Law (see link):

http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/press_releases/1304877525/
look here for the conference's program
http://www.ariel.ac.il/criminology/conferences-heb/3766

We ask you to take part in this campaign. You can either re-send Gush Shalom's letter, with your endorsement, or compose a text of your own. You can look up the participants' web links in the ed of this mail.

When writing to Jean-Pierre Gauci it might be worthwhile to mention his being a board member and national coordinator for Malta of the European Network Against Racism, and with Breea C. Willingham - that she has extensively dealt with issues of ethnicity and race relations in the US, and with various issues dealing with the situation of Afro-Americans. This would seem incompatible with the two speaking at a settlement in an Occupied Territory.

It might also be worthwhile to mention the call for boycotting Ariel by Israeli lecturers and Israeli artists.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4011006,00.html
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/150-academics-artists-back-actors-boycott-of-settlement-arts-center-1.311149

Email addresses - international participants:

Jean-Pierre Gauci, King's College, London

<jean-pierre.gauci@kcl.ac.uk> or <jean@pfcmalta.org>

Dr. Jean-Pierre Gauci is Malta’s representative in the European Integration Forum and a He is director of the People for Change Foundation where his work is mainly research, advocacy and capacity building on migration, integration, asylum and human trafficking.
Race relations race and ethnicity issues.

Web links:
http://www.labourmigration.eu/expert-profiles/profile/48-jean-pierre-gauci

http://www.kcl.ac.uk/law/research/researchdegrees/phdprofiles/jgauci.aspx

Isla Masson, King's College, London

<isla.masson@kcl.ac.uk>

Web links
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/law/research/researchdegrees/phdprofiles/imasson.aspx
http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/islaexpaper.pdf

Breea C. Willingham, State University of New York

http://www.sbu.edu/About_SBU.aspx?id=11360

Dr. Stephen J. Tripodi, Florida State University
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1110300
http://csw.fsu.edu/staff_pages/tripodi.php

כתובות מייל - משתתפים ישראלים
Email addresses - Israeli participants

Prof. Sarah ben David <bendas@gmail.com> פרופ' שרה בן דוד
Dr. Gila Chen <chengila6@gmail.com> ד"ר גילה חן
Dr. Keren Gueta <keren@gueta.com> ד"ר קרן גואטה
Dr. Gabi (Gabriel) Cavaglion <Gabi58@zahav.net.il> ד"ר גבי קבליון
Gil Ronen <gil@familism.org> גיל רונן
MK. Julia Shamalov- Berkovitz <yulias@knesset.gov.il > ח"כ יוליה שמאלוב ברקוביץ`
Dr. Yael Wilchek-Aviad <aviadyael@walla.co.il> ד"ר יעל וילצ'ק אביעד
Dr. Brenda Geiger <geigerb@netvision.net.il> ד"ר ברנדה גייגר
Dr. Tali Shimkin <talishu@netvision.net.il> ד"ר טלי שימקין
Dr. Mally Shechory <mally@bezeqint.net> ד"ר מלי שחורי
Dr. Inna Levy <Innale@ariel.ac.il> or < inna_levy@bezeqint.net> ד"ר אינה לוי
Adv. Avi Himi <himi_law@netvision.net.il> עו"ד אבי חימי
Dr. Sharon Aharony-Goldenberg <goldens@biu.ac.il> ד"ר שרון אהרוני גולדנברג
Dr. Judith Abulafia <abulafiaj@biu.013.net.il>
or <abulaj@mail.biu.ac.il> ד"ר יהודית אבולעפיה


bcc to: info@gush-shalom.org


Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Oh what a lovely war! (for some)

BBC PANORAMA this evening went looking for an estimated S23 billion (£11.75bn) that had somehow been lost, stolen or just not properly accounted for in Iraq. What it showed was how well some private contractors have done from the war and occupation. They range from vice president Dick Cheney's old firm KBR Halliburton through to an obscure former kitchen-fitting company that somehow got itself an accounting contract on billion dollar deals.

The enterprising methods used were such that Sergeant Ernie Bilko might have gasped at them. One company helped itself to Iraqi government fork-lift trucks, resprayed them, then hired them out at suitably inflated prices. Another allegedly sent unprotected civilian drivers out risking ambushes, even with empty trucks, so it could bump up its charges for supplying the army.

Open contracts on a costs plus basis encouraged firms to charge what they liked. Halliburton was awarded contracts without anyone else being invited to bid. The US military - i.e. the taxpayer - paid for meals that were never delivered.

The darker side of this tale is of Iraqi prisoners tortured at Abu Ghraib by contractors not even subject to military law, and civilians shot by trigger-happy mercenaries.

A US gagging order, preventing discussion of the allegations, applies to 70 court cases against some of the top US companies. While George Bush remains in the White House, it is unlikely the gagging orders will be lifted. To date, no major US contractor faces trial for fraud or mismanagement in Iraq.

In fact it is those responsible officials who objected to wrongdoing or raised too many questions who seem to have lost their jobs, or in one case, had their life endangered in Iraq.

Not all the profiteers are Americans, of course. With world oil prices soaring we noticed that the oil concessions which Kurdish regional ministers are granting companies like Hunt Petroleum are not just upsetting the Iraqi government which says they are illegal, but kept under wraps from the Kurdish people and their representatives too.

Panorama's search for missing billions also led to a house in Acton, West London where Hazem Shalaan lived until he was appointed to the new Iraqi government as minister of defence in 2004.

Shalaan and his associates were supposed to be buying the latest military equipment, but went for a load of cheap second-hand gear from Poland. With the difference they were able to siphon an estimated $1.2 billion out of the ministry, and divert it to their overseas accounts. Shalaan was investigated and sentenced to two jail terms, but he fled the country, claiming the accusations against him were all a plot by pro-Iranian MPs . There is an Interpol warrant out, but the runaway minister, who still owns the Acton house and property in the Marble Arch area, is still zooming around by private jet.

After recent programmes looking at targets such as illegal immigrants, I'm glad to see Panorama plucking up the courage to investigaate more serious offenders, with their power and wealth. Some of what the programme had to say, such as private contractors outnumbering US soldiers in Iraq, we have already heard from less established communicators such as Naomi Klein. But hopefully, this programme will get more people thinking, and wondering what we have yet to be told. The BBC reporter did note that KBR Halliburton has been awarded the contract to supply British forces in Iraq. After that trip to look at a disgraced minister's former modest home in Acton (where incidentally another Halliburton subsidiary does the bins and street cleaning for Ealing council) , I've suggested the Panourama team take a look at KBR Halliburton's place up the road at Greenford, or Bechtel in Hammersmith, and find out about how much these companies are making from their operations in Britain.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 04, 2007

Spot of Bovver


YOUNG Charlie Goodman (below)getting arrested on October 4, 1936.

And (right), Jack Spot, or Comer, with wife Rita leaving court in 1954. Spot dined out often (probably at the Cumberland) on his account of daring deeds at Cable Street, but Charlie reckoned the East End villain was not even there.




THIS time last year I was off to a meeting marking the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, when Sir Oswald Mosley's fascists were prevented from marching through London's East End. Aubrey Morris who was there as a teenager spoke, and Assad Rehman of the Newham Monitoring Project, involved in today's struggle against racism. That weekend I helped on a stall at the commemoration in the park off Cable Street.

A 71st anniversary is not usually an occasion, but it just so happens that I have been enjoying David Roberts' Hollow Crown, the second of his novels that I've read. Set in the 1930s with a country house murder, an upper class gentleman detective hero to whom police officers defer as "Milord", it might almost be taken as a pastiche of Dorothy L.Sayers and that genre, except that David Roberts sets his stories amid real history - the Spanish Civil War, the Abdication Crisis, the Jarrow Crusade, and the Battle of Cable Street.

With hindsight the author may give history just a little tweak, or his characters foresight. His dashing young Communist journalist Verity Browne is already doubting the Party, and whether the Republic can win in Spain, though as Joe Jacobs points out in Out of the Ghetto, the Spanish Civil War had only begun a few months before the battle in the East End. Still, Roberts' timing is real enough to have had his heroine recounting her harrowing experiences at Toledo, around the siege of the Alcazar.

Some of Roberts' fictitious characters bear resemblances to real figures, which should give the historian fun spotting them. Some real actors appear in cameo as themselves - Mrs. Simpson, for instance, and Ellen Wilkinson the MP for Jarrow (whom my Mum greatly admired). But one of them gets a mention that could almost be a deliberate howler, when Lord Edward descends into the East End with Verity:.

"Where are we going exactly?" he inquired at last.
Verity said, "Jack Spot - you know who I mean?"
"He's one of your Party's organisers, isn't he?"
"Yes, we're meeting him and other Party workers in Cable Street. I think the idea is to build a barricade to stop the Mosleyites..."
Unless David Roberts knows of a different Jack Spot to the one whom we've heard of, a crooked bookmaker and protection racketeer by the real name of Jack Comer, we must assume he has digested some dodgy research. Comer the commie is a hitherto unknown, figuring neither in books on crime nor accounts of East End communism. He is not mentioned either by Phil Piratin in "Our Flag Stays Red , nor in Joe Jacobs' Out of the Ghetto. Jack Spot the villain was a well-known character in East End pub yarns, taxi drivers' tales, and Sunday paper crime stories, though after being unseated by upcoming rivals he seems to have spent his last years quietly, taking coffee each morning with his lovely wife Rita at the Cumberland hotel near Marble Arch, and doubtless,like many an East End villain gone up West, wondering what the younger generation was coming to.
In Hollow Crown, Spot is spotted atop a barricade, waving "what looked like a chair-leg", as he exhorts the crowd to action. In Gangland , James Morton writes:
"In 1935 (sic) Spot became a local folk hero by leading a Jewish team against Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts when they marched down Cable Street in the East End. According to Spot he approached Mosley's leading bodyguard, a six-foot all-in wrestler, 'Roughneck', and felled him with a chair-leg filled with lead. It was a story on which he traded for the remainder for the remainder of his working life".
Maybe Spot/Comer, though not a political activist, did play some part in the battle of Cable Street in 1936 (though if he was there a year earlier, as in Morton's book that might explain why others don't remember him! ) But most of the fighting that day, both in Cable Street and at Gardiners Corner where the biggest crowds gathered, was against the police, who tried and failed to force a way through for the fascists. When the late Charlie Goodman, who was arrested that day, was asked about Spot by a young guy at a meeting some years ago he said "Jack Spot was not even there, he was in Birmingham that weekend".
Spot did offer protection to Jewish shopkeepers at this time, perhaps combining his loyalties and profession. He also turns up a decade later, in a slightly different role, in Morris Beckman's account of later fights with the fascists in The 43 Group:
"One evening, three large men, well-dressed in raglan coats and trilbies, came into HQ and demanded to see 'the guvnor' Their leader told Bernerd, 'Now listen -if you ever need money or the help of my lads, let me know.
He was thanked, but his offer was declined; this was Jack Spot, a notorious gangster".
Having not been born till six years and six days after the famous battle of Cable Street, I can offer no authoritative judgement as to whether Jack Spot was there or in Birmingham. I think it is fairly certain that he was never a member of the Communist Party! There are not that many real Cable Street veterans left around, but if any are out on the net perhaps we'll hear from them, or their offspring, on this topic.
Meantime, don't let my carks prevent you enjoying David Roberts' book(s), as I have, and while I'm at it, I might as well mention another book I've been enjoying, Are You Still Circumcised? , East End Memories by Harold Rosen, that's Michael Rosen's dad and Mike writes the Introduction. Harold Rosen describes going to Cable Street as a young lad with his friends. Like Lord Edward he finds himself on the wrong side of the barricade as the police charge and he is snatched into a house for safety. He then reflects from his own experience comparing notes with his friends, on how memories can prove faulty!

Labels: , , ,

Monday, September 25, 2006

Guns n' Roses

UNDER investigation, but probably not alone,
3rd Battalion, Yorkshire Regiment.

I'VE had a bad habit for as long as I can remember. Every so often I ask questions which people either regard as a wind-up, reacting with annoyance, or ignore, apart from giving me funny looks and moving on to another subject. It's not that I'm clever or devious. I really am that naieve.

Ten years ago, a few of us were sitting in a London pub one evening discussing the day's news, specifically some shootings. I ventured to say that I had been wondering where all the guns were coming from. I grew up in the decades after World War II, when plenty of people had military experience, and we still had conscription. There must have been quite a few souvenirs about. We occasionally heard rumours of someone's uncle possessing a firearm, but rarely read news of them being used - even by professional criminals.

Nowadays they seem to be plentiful, allegedly a fashion accessory in some circles, and used quite casually - young women gunned down in a drive-by shooting in Birmingham, and just recently a 15-year old boy shot dead in Moss Side, Manchester, apparently by mistake for someone else. Various factors must have contributed to this state of affairs, to the demand as well as supply.

One explanation I heard given for the availability of weapons was the break-up of the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact. In Prague, I saw Russian soldiers selling army watches and other surplus, and I don't doubt more lethal hardware was available down some backstreet. Probably tanks and WMDs too, if you went further up the military ladder. But the weapons more often used have been easier to pack Uzis and, in the case of the Harlesden shootings we were talking about, an Ingrams machine pistol, an American weapon.

Well, one of our number that evening in the pub was a copper, and not normally shy when airing his opinions , but he did not seem to have any theory to offer about the supply of shooters in our cities. Then somehow the subject was changed. Or so I thought. An ex-para who had only recently come out of the Army, was shaking his head over some news he had heard that was not, I think, in the papers - Army SIB's raiding several barracks for illegal drugs.

We didn't get further into that, because the other team had arrived for our quiz match. But later various scraps of information floated together in a backwater of my mind. Ingrams taken off captured Argentinians in the Falklands. The army's investigators making drugs raids. An apocryphal tale I heard from someone about trading unidentified pills to eager British squaddies in Bosnia to obtain diesel. Well it helped get badly needed supplies to Tuzla, and at least the squaddies won't have got pregnant.

I've asked my question about where the weapons come from in various places, without answers, but not so far aired the little theory that took shape in my nasty over-imaginative mind. Until this item appeared today in The Guardian.

Army examines illegal trade in guns from Iraq
Richard Norton-Taylor, Monday September 25, 2006, Guardian

Army prosecutors are investigating the "unlawful possession" of guns by British soldiers who allegedly smuggled the weapons out of Iraq and sold them on the black market for drugs and money.

The Ministry of Defence confirmed yesterday that the Army Prosecuting Authority is conducting an inquiry, following a report that soldiers from the 3rd Battalion Yorkshire Regiment had sold the guns. It is understood that they are not British army weapons.

"The Royal Military police carried out an investigation involving the unlawful possession of small arms," a spokeswoman said. The case was now in the hands of the prosecuting authority, the MoD added.

The guns were allegedly taken from Iraq into Germany, where the battalion had a base, on at least six occasions, according to the Sunday Times. It said it had been told that some of the weapons had been exchanged for cocaine. The allegations come as a growing number of soldiers are being tested positive for drugs and amid reports of a burgeoning trade in illicit guns in Iraq.


The battalion completed a tour of duty in southern Iraq last year and is now based in Warminster, Wiltshire.

Let's keep all this in perspective. Jamaica's boom in gun crime in the 1970s, which has eventually had its imitation in Britain, began with firearms shipped in from the 'States, either by American organised crime looking for an alternative offshore base to Cuba, or the CIA setting out to destabilise the Manley government. Come to think of it these conspiracy theories are not mutually exclusive.

Britain's worst shooting sprees, at Hungerford (sixteen people killed and fifteen wounded in 1987) and Dunblane (1996, sixteen children and their teacher shot dead) were carried out not by Yardie gangs or terrorists but by supposedly respectable citizens whom the police trusted with legally licensed weapons, including at Hungerford an AK47.

In London we have had painter and decorator Harry Stanley shot dead because someone thought a repaired table leg he was carrying home was a firearm, and electrician Jean Charles de Menezes shot seven times in the head because a police surveillance team thought he looked like a "terrorist". Opinion has become divided as to whether the ordinary citizen going to or from work is in more danger from the villains or from those who are supposed to be protecting the public.

Labels: ,